Recognition of a Palestinian state: rage, panic and anger among the French relays of the criminal policy of Netanyahu
As the official announcement by Emmanuel Macron approaches the recognition of the Palestine State next September at the UN, the outraged reaction of French supports from Netanyahu no doubt: they never wanted a Palestinian state. Their facade attachment to a “two -state solution” has always been only a hollow discourse, a diplomatic formula without the slightest desire for concrete translation. Their speech was only a diplomatic screen, a mechanically repeated facade posture to change. Worse still: these political and institutional figures, which today cry for betrayal, have never been outraged by the genocide in progress in Gaza. Not a word on tens of thousands of deaths, on children buried under the ruins, on destroyed hospitals, on organized famine.
On the contrary, they served as docile relays for the colonial and criminal policy of Benyamin Netanyahu, supporting without flawing his business of systematic destruction of the Palestinian people, while screaming to “anti -Semitism” or to “the defense of a terrorist movement” as soon as a voice dared to claim justice.
Meyer Habib, an unwavering close to the Israeli, racialist and messianic extreme right, gets carried away: “Total disgust !! (…) A magnificent price to terrorists, Islamists (…) The voice of Emmanuel Macron no longer counts nowhere !! ».

MP Caroline Yadan, also close to the Israeli extreme right, in an equally alarmist posture, speaks of a “political, moral and historical fault” which “hit it deeply”. She recently illustrated herself by a delirious bill aimed at censor the accusations of genocide concerning Gaza.
The CRIF, admirer of Netanyahu, faithful to his invariable line of support for Israeli impunity, denounces a decision taken “without conditions”, described as “political danger”.

Julien Dray, still in ambiguity, says that “the creation of a Palestinian state” is the way to follow, but immediately buried the French initiative by dealing with “diplomatic gesticulation” which will have “the opposite effect”. Behind this ambiguity hides unwavering support for Israeli policy, made up for years by statements of principle on a Palestinian state which never translates into the slightest concrete commitment.

Behind this frenzy, a fear: that of seeing decades of propaganda, media and political pressures, intimidation and lies collapse. The fear that the recognition of the Palestinian state finally puts up their hypocrisy and their complicity with an apartheid regime. Because it is not the Hamas that they fear – it is that justice ends up imposing itself.
